Should we replace Archer?

Usually no — for the GRC system of record, Archer is well-established. AirTee replaces the operational resilience pieces (incident, BCM, exercises, AAR) and feeds outcomes into Archer.

How is the integration?

AirTee writes incidents, control updates and AAR outcomes back to Archer via the Archer REST API.

C3AirTee.ai vs Archer

Keep the GRC. Replace the spreadsheets next to it.

AirTee.ai doesn't try to be Archer. It replaces the operational tooling Archer never quite reached — incident command, BCM, exercises — and writes the outcomes back.

01Together

A clean division of labour.

▍Archer: GRC system of record, controls catalogue, audit trails.
▍AirTee: live resilience operations + plan-and-exercise loop.
▍Bi-directional API: AirTee writes incidents and AAR control updates into Archer.
▍Single source of truth for controls remains Archer; AirTee is the source of truth for operations.

FAQ

Quick answers

Should we replace Archer?: Usually no — for the GRC system of record, Archer is well-established. AirTee replaces the operational resilience pieces (incident, BCM, exercises, AAR) and feeds outcomes into Archer.
How is the integration?: AirTee writes incidents, control updates and AAR outcomes back to Archer via the Archer REST API.

— next step

See AirTee in your environment.

We'll model one of your real scenarios live.

Request a demo →Book intro call